Unit i case study, unit ii journal, unit ii essay

Item I Contingency Study

Instructions

Please learn the contingency DCS Sanitation Management v. Eloy Castillo (and helped not attributable attributablees), linked in the relation underneath: 

DCS Sanitation Management v. Castillo, 435 F.3d 892, (8th Cir. 2006). Retrieved from https://advance-lexis-com.libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/api/permalink/0662e8d7-58b8-4877-a028-3ae9a3249480/?context=1516831

Once you enjoy learn and reviewed the contingency scenario, tally to the coercionthcoming questions: 

  1. Discuss the legitimate implications coercion exerciseers and exerciseees coercion requiring exerciseees to signalal noncompete coincidements. What factors did the seek attend in making its firmness? Compare and dissimilarity Ohio and Nebraska’s positions on noncompete clauses. 
  2. Which particularize’s laws help religions ceced in the separation of this contingency? 

Your exculpation should be a incompleteness of couple pages in protraction. You are required to reason at meanest your textdimensions as cacorrection embodied coercion your exculpation. All causes reasond, including the textbook, must be relationd; paraphrased and quoted embodied must enjoy congenial APA mode citations.

Item II Life

Instructions

Learn the Contingency Problem, Cianbro Corporation in Section 5, p. 113, #10. Discuss whether a immediate astringent classify should be supposing. Do you coincide with the union’s objections? What is the rationale coercion your firmness?  Your life minute must be at meanest 200 language. No relations or citations are certain.

During August to October 2002, Cianbro Corporation applied to the Itemed Particularizes Department of Drudge and the Maine Department of Drudge coercion H-2B immediate drudge certifications coercion as manifold as 120 coercioneign workers to be occupied as structural and pipe welders on couple monster glaze rigs not attributable attributableorious as the Amethyst 4 and 5 that were subordinate view in the accommodate of Portland, Maine. To produce their determinations, the DOL and the Maine DOL were required to estimate controlling stipend and instituted stipulations coercion the jobs coercion which Cianbro sought immediate drudge certifica- tions pursuant to a DOL practice, 20 C.F.R. § 656.40. Federal practices (8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(6) (iii)(A)) supposing that precedently filing a prayer with the INS (now USCIS) controller in whose legalization a prayering exerciseer intends to exercise an H-2B nonagricultural immediate worker, the exerciseer must adduce coercion a immediate drudge certification with the Secretary of Drudge. The Secretary of Drudge’s immediate drudge certification supposing regulate to the INS controller on “whether or not attributable attributable attributable Itemed Particularizes workers choice of performing the immediate services or drudge are advantageous and whether the alien’s exercisement achieve adversely pretend the stipend and instituted stipulations of similarly occupied Itemed Particularizes workers.” Manifold suitable and advantageous U.S. workers applied coercion positions with Cianbro as structural and pipe welders during the duration when the DOL was reckoned to be reevaluating the substance following voucher of the pertinent union’s missive, opposite the company’s application; at-last, nindividual was offered exercisement by Cianbro. Meanwhile the federal and particularize agencies designed to outcome more than 50 H-2B visas. On March 21, 2003 the pertinent unions filed an application coercion a immediate astringent classify. Should the seek give this TRO, blocking the issuance of the H-2B visas, pending separation of the unions’ objections? What plan attendations should the referee follow into recital on twain sides of the disagreement when making this firmness? [See Maine Particularize Building and View Council v. Chao, 265 F. Supp.2d 105 (D. Maine 2003).]

Item II Essay -link to dimensions is underneath  

reason Section 3, 4, and 5 secure you relation this dimensions and another. 

Usurpation and Drudge Law, 9th Edition

Patrick J. Cihon; James Ottavio Castagnera

Instructions

Choose individual of the spiritless workplace torts discussed in the section learnings coercion this item (save genetic testing). Prepare a local plan coercion the exerciseer that balances the exerciseer and exerciseees’ rights. Give the rationale and help coercion your plan. 

This provision should be a incompleteness of individual page in protraction. You are required to reason at meanest your textdimensions as cacorrection embodied coercion your exculpation. All causes reasond, including the textbook, must be relationd; paraphrased and quoted embodied must enjoy congenial citations per APA guidelines.

Order a unique copy of this paper
(275 words)

Approximate price: $11.5

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.

Read more

Free-revision policy

The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.

Read more

Privacy policy

The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By placing an order with us, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.

Read more
  • Order now for this paper or similar assignments at discounted prices
  • WhatsApp chat